Eichhornia crassipes scorecard

2100
Impact
SpreadNotesScore
Spread Rate spreads vegetatively and sexually. 3
Spread Amount problem in fresh and brackish water throughout. 3
DamageNotesScore
Ecological Potential to out compete native species. Rated high in the Cal-IPC inventory. 5
Agricultural interfers with irrigation. 3
Infrastructure clogs dams, drains, irrigation. 3
Cultural Could impact shoreline fishing. 2
Health creates mosquito habitat. 2
BenefitNotesScore
Ecological 0
Agricultural 0
Infrastructure sewage outflow filtration. 2
Cultural aquatic ornamental. 1
Benefit Health 0
Ability to Respond
Ease of ResponseNotesScore
Detection requires system wide surveys particular in areas of recreational fishing. 3
Control past eradication efforts suggest relatively ease of control if detected quickly prior to extensive spread. Responds to herbicides. 3
Tools in PlaceNotesScore
Entry CDFA C listed plant. 2
Control mandated control at local level and by some Agencies, but not common. also some work by CDFA on biological control 2
Outreach On CDFA and Cal-IPC lists and included on Don't Plant a Pest Brochure. CA Dept of Boating & Waterways has had a very effective program in the Sac/SJ Delta (V. Guise) 2
Scorecard Totals
Impact Total:
18
[Impact] = ([Spread] + [Damage] - [Benefit])
Ability to Respond Total:
12
[Ability to Respond] = ([Ease of Response] + [Tools in Place])
Confidence
Confidence:  high
Notes:
Sources: