Limnoperna fortunei scorecard

1776
Contributor(s):
Impact
SpreadNotesScore
Spread Rate Spread is inevitalbe within interconnected waterways, spread can be at best defered between nearby lakes. 5
Spread Amount Can spread to low calcium lakes, can tolerate brackish water very well, does not tolerate very cold temperatures so alpine lakes nto susceptible. 5
DamageNotesScore
Ecological Has severely impacted foodchain, natural species of mussels, algae and benthic plants in Southamerica. 5
Agricultural Aquaculture impacts and possible restrictions; higher thermal tolerance than other mussels thus anticipated high impact on field irrigation canals. 3
Infrastructure Severe impact on power generation, dams, and water conveyance systems for drinking water and irrigation. 5
Cultural impacts on water and boating recreation; impacts on submerged archeological sites. 3
Health Indirect impacts through potential for toxic algae blooms. 1
BenefitNotesScore
Ecological 0
Agricultural 0
Infrastructure 0
Cultural 0
Benefit Health 0
Ability to Respond
Ease of ResponseNotesScore
Detection Adult detection relatively easy, larval detection moderate to difficult for proper identification. 3
Control Boat inspections costly and not entirely effective; once established, very difficult to control. 1
Tools in PlaceNotesScore
Entry Ballast water regulations will help control this species even though not specifically directed at it. 1
Control No specific mandates in place 0
Outreach No specific mandates in place 0
Scorecard Totals
Impact Total:
27
[Impact] = ([Spread] + [Damage] - [Benefit])
Ability to Respond Total:
5
[Ability to Respond] = ([Ease of Response] + [Tools in Place])
Confidence
Confidence:  high
Notes:
Sources: