Tamarix ramosissima scorecard

2203
Contributor(s):
Impact
SpreadNotesScore
Spread Rate Doubling rate without management was about 6 years (Cal-IPC). 4
Spread Amount Southern Klamath Ranges, Central Valley, eastern Sierra Nevada, Tehachapi Mountains, western Transverse Ranges, South Coast, and deserts, to 800m (DiTomaso). 4
DamageNotesScore
Ecological High water use, increases soil salinity, increases flood and fire frequency (Cal-IPC). 4
Agricultural Due to plant’s tremendous water use that affects ground and surface water availability (Vince Guide, pers comm). 3
Infrastructure Barrier to flood flows (Cal-IPC). 2
Cultural 0
Health 0
BenefitNotesScore
Ecological 0
Agricultural Popular ornamental plant. 1
Infrastructure 0
Cultural 0
Benefit Health 0
Ability to Respond
Ease of ResponseNotesScore
Detection Easy to detect. 5
Control Manual removal or systemic herbicides (DiTomaso). Biocontrols may help with control availability (Vince Guide, pers comm). 3
Tools in PlaceNotesScore
Entry CDFA "B" rated noxious weed (Vince Guide, pers comm). 3
Control Local mandates in place and active biological control program established. 3
Outreach Local outreach occuring. On CDFA and Cal-IPC lists and brochure available. 1
Scorecard Totals
Impact Total:
16
[Impact] = ([Spread] + [Damage] - [Benefit])
Ability to Respond Total:
15
[Ability to Respond] = ([Ease of Response] + [Tools in Place])
Confidence
Confidence:  high
Notes: