Xylophilus ampelinus (Xanthomonas ampelina) scorecard

2327
Contributor(s):
Impact
SpreadNotesScore
Spread Rate First noted Crete, Greece, 1969. Spread to France, Greece, Italy, Moldova, Portugal (unconfirmed), Slovenia, Spain and Turkey (eradicated). 3
Spread Amount Grapevines only known host. Spread on infected propagative material and by pruning equipment. Requires moist, humid, warm conditions (overhead irrigation). 2
DamageNotesScore
Ecological Only infects grapevines. Wild grapevines may be susceptible. 1
Agricultural Severe infection of susceptible cultivars can lead to serious harvest losses of 70% and more. Benign if controlled by copper sprays 3
Infrastructure 0
Cultural May impact tourism of vincultural areas. 1
Health 0
BenefitNotesScore
Ecological 0
Agricultural 0
Infrastructure 0
Cultural 0
Benefit Health 0
Ability to Respond
Ease of ResponseNotesScore
Detection Standard bacteriological tests and three serological techniques exist for rapid identification. Visible symptoms appear in 2nd year of growth following infection. Natural dispersal is limited to the vineyard and immediately surrounding area. 4
Control Control can be obtained only through viticultural practices. 4
Tools in PlaceNotesScore
Entry X. ampelinus is an EPPO A2 quarantine organism (OEPP/EPPO, 1984) and is also of quarantine significance for NAPPO and the IAPSC. if material is imported from areas where the disease is known to occur, nursery inspections are necessary 4
Control No special regulatory measures for detection in propagative stock or production agriculture other than clean stock program. 1
Outreach Scientific and regulatory community aware of pest. 1
Scorecard Totals
Impact Total:
10
[Impact] = ([Spread] + [Damage] - [Benefit])
Ability to Respond Total:
14
[Ability to Respond] = ([Ease of Response] + [Tools in Place])
Confidence
Confidence:  medium
Notes: